176: FDR v. “The Nine Old Men” (The New Deal pt. 3): Court Packing and Closing the New Deal

2025-03-24 · 64 min · 9 entities

episode page audio

Asserted relationships

→ hosted by Prof. Greg Jackson person

0.55

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Prof. Greg Jackson
→ discusses Education concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Education
→ discusses History website

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: History
→ hosted by ProfGregJackson company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: ProfGregJackson

Entities found in this episode

concepts 3

mentioned Education concept

0.50

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Education
discusses Education concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Education
mentioned FDR concept

0.35

evidence rules-v5
FDR

persons 2

mentioned Prof. Greg Jackson person

0.70

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Prof. Greg Jackson
hosted by Prof. Greg Jackson person

0.55

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Prof. Greg Jackson

companys 2

mentioned ProfGregJackson company

0.70

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: ProfGregJackson
hosted by ProfGregJackson company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: ProfGregJackson

websites 2

mentioned History website

0.50

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: History
discusses History website

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: History

Episode description as stored

“No matter how great and good a man may be, executive aggrandizement is not safe for democracy.” This is the story of Franklin’s second term and his battle with the Supreme Court. It’s no secret that SCOTUS hasn’t really been ruling in the New Deal’s favor. But with such an overwhelming victory at the polls, Franklin feels confident that he can circumvent that by upping the number of judges from nine to fifteen and appointing people who see the vision. But what does the public make of it? What does Congress think? Is this court-packing plan a timely reform? Or is it a blatant disregard for the constitutional concept of checks and balances? It’s incredibly polarizing, so much so that members of Congress are willing to argue, filibuster, and even die over the bill. Literally. ____ Connect with us on HTDSpodcast.com and go deep into episode bibliographies and book recommendations join discussions in our Facebook community get news and discounts from The HTDS Gazette come see a live show get HTDS merch or become an HTDS premium member for bonus episodes and other perks. HTDS is part of Audacy media network. Interested in advertising on the History That Doesn't Suck? Contact Audacyinc.com