A First Amendment Defense Attorney on the White House Press Ban
2026-09-24 · 41 min · 8 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.63
evidence rules-v5
A First Amendment Defense Attorney on the White House Press Ban
-
0.55
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Liz Oyer
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Government
Entities found in this episode
persons 3
-
0.70
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Liz Oyer
-
0.66
evidence rules-v5
A First Amendment Defense Attorney on the White House Press Ban
-
0.55
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Liz Oyer
concepts 2
-
0.50
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Education
companys 2
-
0.50
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Government
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Government
podcasts 1
-
0.63
evidence rules-v5
A First Amendment Defense Attorney on the White House Press Ban
Episode description as stored
Can a president ban reporters because he doesn’t like their coverage? Liz Oyer sits down with media law litigator Susan Seager to examine the White House's ban on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico and the constitutional questions it raises. They also discuss the president’s lawsuits against the media, efforts to uncover journalists’ confidential sources, and what these actions mean for the public’s right to know.
Have a question about the legal news? Send Liz an email at ask@isthisreallylegal.org or leave a message at 202-495-1458.
This episode was recorded on September 23, 2026, before the district court’s ruling.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.isthisreallylegal.org