The one AI detector people actually trust
2026-07-16 · 38 min · 9 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Technology
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: News
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Tech News
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Vox Media Podcast Network
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: The Verge
Entities found in this episode
companys 6
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Vox Media Podcast Network
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: The Verge
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Technology
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Technology
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Vox Media Podcast Network
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: The Verge
concepts 3
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Tech News
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: News
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Tech News
Episode description as stored
AI text detectors have been notoriously unreliable, but that's starting to change. This year, Pangram keeps coming up as the trusted source in identifying AI-written text. We sit down with Pangram CEO Max Spero to find out how the system was made, how much we should trust it, and where the line is between useful AI and AI slop.
Further reading:
OnePlus officially gives up on the US and Europe
Google ordered to open Android and Search to rivals in Europe
Brendan Carr plans to let broadcast giants dominate the airwaves
The literary world isn’t prepared for AI
Subscribe to The Verge for unlimited access to theverge.com, subscriber-exclusive newsletters, and our ad-free podcast feed.
We love hearing from you! Email your questions and thoughts to vergecast@theverge.com or call us at 866-VERGE11.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices