Matt Ridley on Climate Change
2015-06-29 · 68 min · episode 479 · 18 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Matt Ridley on Climate Change
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
Entities found in this episode
concepts 12
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
persons 5
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.66
evidence rules-v4
Matt Ridley on Climate Change
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
podcasts 1
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Matt Ridley on Climate Change
Episode description as stored
Science writer and author Matt Ridley discusses climate change with EconTalk host Russ Roberts. Based on his reading of the scientific evidence, Ridley describes himself as a "lukewarmer." While Ridley agrees that humans have made the climate warmer, he argues that the impact is small or positive over some temperature ranges and regions. He rejects the catastrophic scenarios that some say are sufficiently likely to justify dramatic policy responses, and he reflects on the challenges of staking out an unpopular position on a contentious policy issue.