Have the Democrats Decided to Win?

2025-11-08 · 63 min · episode 210 · 9 entities

episode page audio

Asserted relationships

→ discusses Society & Culture concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
→ discusses News concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: News
→ discusses Technology company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Technology
→ hosted by Audioboom company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Audioboom
→ hosted by Crooked Media company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Crooked Media

Entities found in this episode

companys 6

mentioned Audioboom company

0.70

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Audioboom
mentioned Crooked Media company

0.70

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Crooked Media
mentioned Technology company

0.50

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Technology
discusses Technology company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Technology
hosted by Audioboom company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Audioboom
hosted by Crooked Media company

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Crooked Media

concepts 3

mentioned Society & Culture concept

0.50

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
discusses Society & Culture concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
discusses News concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: News

Episode description as stored

Something happened in 2016 that led Democrats to campaign on unpopular issues. Researcher Simon Bazelon digs into extensive polling data—and on-the-ground-results from tight races—to explain where elites steered us off course, how we can neutralize Trump’s advantages, and why voters might not actually want radical change. Then, he and Jon discuss the pitfalls of an attention economy that gives clicks but NOT votes to viral, trendy policies. For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here .For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast.