Daron Acemoglu on Inequality and the Financial Crisis
2011-02-21 · 64 min · episode 251 · 18 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Daron Acemoglu on Inequality and the Financial Crisis
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
Entities found in this episode
concepts 12
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
persons 5
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.66
evidence rules-v4
Daron Acemoglu on Inequality and the Financial Crisis
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
podcasts 1
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Daron Acemoglu on Inequality and the Financial Crisis
Episode description as stored
Daron Acemoglu of MIT talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about the role income inequality may have played in creating the financial crisis. Raghuram Rajan in his book, Fault Lines, argues that growing income inequality in the last part of the 20th century created a political demand for redistribution and various policy changes. This in turn created the push for higher home ownership rates and led to the distortions of the housing market that in turn led to excessive risk-taking in the financial market. Acemoglu suggests a simpler story where the financial sector through its political influence distorted the rules of the game, benefiting executives in the industry, which in turn led to outsized rewards and ultimate instability in the financial industry. The conversation discusses ways of distinguishing between these two arguments and what might be done to change the incentives of politicians.