Robert Frank on Inequality
2010-11-15 · 62 min · episode 237 · 18 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Robert Frank on Inequality
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
Entities found in this episode
concepts 12
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
persons 5
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.66
evidence rules-v4
Robert Frank on Inequality
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
podcasts 1
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Robert Frank on Inequality
Episode description as stored
Robert Frank of Cornell University talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about inequality. Is there a role for public policy in mitigating income inequality? Is such intervention justified or effective? The conversation delves into both the philosophical and empirical evidence behind differing answers to these questions. Ultimately, Frank argues for a steeply rising tax rate on consumption that would reduce disparities in consumption. This is a lively back-and-forth about a very timely topic.