Don Boudreaux on Public Choice
2010-03-15 · 69 min · episode 202 · 18 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Don Boudreaux on Public Choice
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
Entities found in this episode
concepts 12
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.50
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Science
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Philosophy
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Education
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Courses
-
0.40
evidence rules-v4
Feed category: Social Sciences
persons 5
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.70
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
-
0.66
evidence rules-v4
Don Boudreaux on Public Choice
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Russ Roberts
-
0.55
evidence rules-v4
Feed author/publisher: Library of Economics and Liberty
podcasts 1
-
0.63
evidence rules-v4
Don Boudreaux on Public Choice
Episode description as stored
Don Boudreaux of George Mason University talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about public choice: the application of economics to the political process. Boudreaux argues that political competition is a blunt instrument that works less effectively than economic competition. One reason for this bluntness is the voting process itself--where intensity does not matter, only whether a voter prefers one candidate to the other. A second reason is that political outcomes tend to be one-size-fits-all, which often leads to dissatisfaction. Boudreaux defends the morality of not voting, while Roberts, who does vote from time to time, concedes that one's vote is almost always irrelevant in determining the outcome.