'Fake'n The Bake'n' & 'Perturbing a Private Eye' & 'Maximum Unsatisfaction'
2026-10-01 · 43 min · episode 1061 · 8 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: TV & Film
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Relationships
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Podcast Admin
Entities found in this episode
concepts 6
-
0.50
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.50
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: TV & Film
-
0.50
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Relationships
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: TV & Film
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Relationships
companys 2
-
0.70
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Podcast Admin
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Podcast Admin
Episode description as stored
First, the plaintiff hired the defendants to make her wedding cake. She says the cake looked absolutely terrible and the hotel even refused to serve it because it looked like a health hazard. She’s suing for the cost of the cake and emotional distress. The defendants argue the plaintiff threatened to blow their building up.
Then, the plaintiff is a private investigator. He was hired by the defendant to investigate allegations against the defendant’s sons and found proof they were innocent. The plaintiff says he hasn’t been paid, so he’s suing. The defendant argues she paid the plaintiff.
Plus, the plaintiff bought a new car and found out he had a lot of unpaid parking tickets. The defendant towed his car, and the plaintiff claims the defendant damaged his car in the process. He’s suing for the damages. The defendant argues he didn’t do anything to the car.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices