Can we separate great art from bad artists?

2026-07-18 · 32 min · 8 entities

episode page audio

Asserted relationships

→ hosted by The New Statesman person

0.55

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: The New Statesman
→ discusses Society & Culture concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
→ discusses Arts concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Arts
→ discusses TV & Film concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: TV & Film

Entities found in this episode

concepts 6

mentioned Society & Culture concept

0.50

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
mentioned Arts concept

0.50

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Arts
mentioned TV & Film concept

0.50

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: TV & Film
discusses Society & Culture concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
discusses Arts concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Arts
discusses TV & Film concept

0.40

evidence rules-v5
Feed category: TV & Film

persons 2

mentioned The New Statesman person

0.70

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: The New Statesman
hosted by The New Statesman person

0.55

evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: The New Statesman

Episode description as stored

Throughout history, art, and artists, have caused moral outrage. For a long time we had the liberal notion that we could separate great art from bad artists, but we do seem to live in a time of heightened moralisation around works of art and their creators. Why is that? Tanjil Rashid is joined by Daisy Dixon, who has written the book Depraved: The Story of Dangerous Art. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.