The Myth of Centrism
2026-02-22 · 26 min · 4 entities
Asserted relationships
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: News
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Katie Gatti Tassin & Caro Claire Burke
Entities found in this episode
concepts 3
-
0.50
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: Society & Culture
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed category: News
companys 1
-
0.40
evidence rules-v5
Feed author/publisher: Katie Gatti Tassin & Caro Claire Burke
Episode description as stored
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.diabolicalliespod.com
If you pay attention to political commentary, you’ll often hear a few pieces of conventional wisdom:
— America is “too polarized”
— “Both sides” are “too extreme”
— Or, most innocuously, that politicians should simply do that which is “popular,” which is itself code for policies that are considered “moderate”
But do voters really punish candidates for being extreme? Are most “popular” ideas the “moderate” ones? And, moderate or not, does popularity necessarily indicate merit?
The supposed antidote to this handwringing about political polarization is, more often than not, the mythical “centrist” candidate who will appeal to the even-more-mythical “ordinary American.” Centrism is, as the name implies, an ideology that lacks an ideology.
Today, Diabolical Lies investigates the myth of centrism.
[Full references and citations can be found in the show notes at www.diabolicalliespod.com.]